Posts Tagged Beatrice Romand

Le Beau Mariage

Once again poor Beatrice Romand needs a bloke. She’s had enough of having it off with a married man. “I’m getting married” she tells him “to the man i decide on, who appeals to me. I’ll be very choosy. I’m different. I can do things my way”.

She is different. An odd gawky bird is Beatrice Romand; impulsive, impetuous, big-headed – and yet girlishly charming; and despite all her big talk and grand ideas about herself – vulnerable.

It’s the same old same old Rohmer: self-obsessed “my type, not my type” talk about finding love. About chasing or being chased. Films engrossed – and indulging – in intimacy. And even tho i get irritated by themĀ  – i feel sort of comforted to by all the familiar neurosis that trying to get into intimacy brings – the warm mess of human loving.

You sound like you calculate every move. In fact you’re quite the opposite. You act purely on impulse. You’re insanely selfish” says blonde best friendĀ  Clarisse to Sabine (Romand) “No, wisely selfish” says Sabine.

She does comes across as calculating. And also impulsive. Contradictory and contrary in other words, as well as head-strong – “i tend to argue“.

She’s clapped eyes on Clarisse’s cousin “Edmond” and decided he’s the one. “I intend to make him like me. No man can resist me” (Is this girl conceited or what?!) “With a hard-working husband I’ll be freer to do what i want” (Is this girl selfish or what?!) “I’ll find his weak point, everyone has one. If he doesn’t show me some tenderness next time, i’ll insult him” (Is this girl manipulative or what?!)

So she goes on, with her wilful self-centred machinations: “Instinct tells the female to resist the male so that he’ll desire her (there’s some truth in that) I want him to desire me, to suffer“. You selfish bitch Sabine!

Only he’s not the one that suffers – she is. She’s expecting and waiting for him to call. Waiting. He’s not calling. So she’s calling him. He’s not answering. Avoided and ignored, she’s caught in the rejection trap. Eventually she has to go around to his office to sort it out.

I don’t forsee any tie that will alienate my freedom” he’s saying to her in his sterile lawyerese. “If i get married i want to have chosen my wife freely” So he’s cottoned on to what she was up to. He hasn’t wanted to be made a husband out of. She’s crestfallen. Not so irresistible after all.

She gets into a tantrum:”There are thousands of men more handsome, younger, more interesting than you. Who are worth going after. You’re not!” – and storms out. Hasn’t snared The Husband. I suppose we should feel her selfish machinations have got the kicking they deserve – and yet i felt a tinge of sadness for her too. I think it’s something that Beatrice Romand brings to her character that makes you realise, yes – she’s a capricious little madam – but also there’s a charm about her that is affecting for being so fragile. (I’m starting to sound like a character in a Rohmer film now….Lol)

I always knew i didn’t like him that much” she’s telling Clarisse. How fickle all this love business is! Now i like you, now i don’t like you. I love you – but only if you love me. I desire you, but only if you want me first, and want me more.

That’s the kind of maelstrom of conflicting, ambivalent, emotions that love and relationship mostly is – and which Rohmer, in these 6 Comedies and Proverbs, has tried to show. I’ve seen 4 out of the 6 – and they’ve been irritating and even infuriating to watch at times.

I liked this film much more than i did the first time i saw it. I don’t know why. Maybe i feel more indulgent of Beatrice Romands quirky, gobby, big-headed charm, more sympathetic towards her self-centred vulnerability.

But now I haven’t got any more Rohmer films to watch. That’s it!

I’ll be relieved not to watch any more. And yet i’ve a sneaky feeling i’ll miss not watching them too. Perverse.

His films show – with great sensitivity – how contradictory the nature of loving is, and also how much ambivalence there often is at the heart of everybodys heart.

Dir: Eric Rohmer, France

7.5/10

Leave a Comment

Autumn Tale (1998)

With him there is no intellectual complicity, no affinity, or real tenderness” So says girl to her ex (Philosophy tutor) about her soon to be ex younger boyfriend.

Like with all Rohmer films there’s a lot of “complicity” going on. The weaving of head talk into intricate tangles of complicity.

The frizzy brunette in this film “Magali”- Beatrice Romand – was the little 16 year old frizzy haired charmer in Claire’s Knee. And – 28 years later – she still hasn’t found a boyfriend. Needs matchmaking help from best friend Isabelle. Who puts personal ad in the paper and then goes on the date herself to check out whether Gerard the suitor might be suitable.

Once again – as in virtually every other Rohmer film i’ve watched – it’s all about desperately finding the right mate to mate with, your “type” to type into the next perfect chapter of your perfectable life. A whirligig of emotional insecurity is spun around all the main characters – as if it were all so terribly significant. It’s de rigeur in a Rohmer film to be affectedly self-regarding about “affairs of the heart”.

Magali acknowledges that she “needs to meet a man, but i refuse to do anything about it” Which means she’s either very shy – or very frightened, or stand-offishly fussy. Thinks abit too much of herself. And when she does finally meet Gerard gets into a moody strop with the poor bloke.

Personally, i’d have dropped her like a ton of bricks. But he comes back looking for her. And all gets to be forgiven.

For all the so-called “complicity” going on – the Rohmer film world is suprisingly facile.

Dir: Eric Rohmer, France

6.5/10

Leave a Comment

Claire’s knee (1970)

This is the film that got me into thinking I would like Rohmer films. Hope I’m not going to be horribly disappointed (given how irritated I’ve been with his last 4 efforts)

It’s dreamy summer vacation time in the French Alps boating on the lake.

There’s a precocious girl, Laura. She’s 16 but looks about 12 and talks like a spinsterish maid out of an Anita Brookner novel: “All this beauty exhausts me after a while. It oppresses me. You have to get away“.

She’s into Chekovian conversation with Jerome, a 35 year old diplomat. They’re off running up mountains holding hands. They sit, she leans back into him, he kisses her, she pulls away. “When I’m in love it affects me totally and i forget that I’m happy to be alive” she’s saying.

They’re playing a game with one another. The game of desire and love. Not doing the game. This isn’t going to be distasteful. No, talking about it. She’s needing to “enrich my experience” – and uncly Jerome is safe enough to flirt with.

Jerome is playing out this desire/love game with his Rumanian novelist friend, Aurora, too – like he were a character in one of her stories.

Only he gets fixated on – yes, you guessed it – Claire’s knee. Claire is Laura’s friend and Claire’s has a boyfriend who Jerome doesn’t like.

Jerome is analysising his motives – Chekovian stylee – with Aurora re the “magnet of my desire“, the knee: “Every woman has a vulnerable point, the nape of the neck, the waist, the hands. For Claire, in that position, in that light, it was the knee. It was the precise point where, if i could follow this desire, i would have put my hand“.

And put his hand on her precise point he eventually does, while they’re sheltering from a storm, and he’s upset her telling tales about her boyfriend.

Back to Aurora to give her his report he goes: “It’s the only time I’ve accomplished an act of pure will. I’ve never felt so strongly that something had to be done. It was my good deed” A good boy he’s been (rather than a pervy dirty man) “What i thought to be a gesture of desire, she took as one of consolation“. His hand magnetized to the knee, stuck on it, rubbing it – and crucially – not going off anywhere else it shouldn’t. Cus then he would have been a perv, and the film would have lost all the credit it’s been painstakingly banking in it’s Morality Account.

So: does this film hold up? It does. Even tho the precocious girl thing is there, Beatrice Romand manages to stay the right side of charming (instead of ingratiating) And i felt captured by the languorous summer spirit; sipping cool drinks next to calm lakes overlooking tall mountains. Being indulged in Chekovian conundrums of the heart. The sun is warm. Love is young. Desire is sweet – but fleeting.

And there’s a teasing little tweak in your balls.

This is probably the only Rohmer film I’ll keep and watch again.

Dir: Eric Rohmer, France

8.5/10

Leave a Comment