Archive for May, 2009

Stroszek (1977)

One of those Werner Herzog films i saw back in my early 20’s. Oddly compelling at the time.

Not now though. Odd yes, but not especially compelling.

Bruno S – who plays Stroszek -  is odd bordering on idiot; he declaims his lines in a faux oratory style as if he’s acting being an actor .There’s no appropriate feeling going on to match whats being said. A simpleton sort of soul, vaguely sympathetic, but also strangely alienating. His personal peculiarities belonging somewhere along the Autistic spectrum, left of Aspergers. After a while i found his blank idiocy disingenuously disengaging.

Disingenuously disengaging is how i found the rest of the film too.

Apparently Ian Curtis -  of Joy Division – watched this the night he hung himself. I suppose if you were feeling especially alienated this film would speak to you, alienate you even better.

The scenes at the end; of the truck automatically circuiting round and round, the automated dancing chicken spinning itself madlessly about on its dish, Bruno S swung up high and helpless on the ski lift….these scenes disturbingly stick with you, like images from a bad dream you had, and don’t care too much to remember.

Herzog peoples this film with misfit eccentrics and their eccentricities (like he does in most of his films) losers living as outsiders, not fitting into the “norm”, not fit for the norm – even though they appear to have naive hope in US style normality, materialistic aspirations. You know they’re never gonna fit in, are doomed to be defeated by their automated failure-lifes. Just as alienated and automated as those dancing chickens really.

I don’t know about Werner Herzog. I suppose back in the 70’s he seemed like a mad mystic visionary. And then you get to hear how dull he is interviewed, like a softly spoken, mild-mannered NHS line-manager. And the films he’s made in the last 20 years or so seem stripped of that cult like allure.

Maybe its because we have access to so much film these days, via Dvds, the Internet, etc; we’ve got so much to see – so the tolerance level for stuff that looks willfully obscure, cerebral, or “difficult” is much lower. Well, it is with me. I’m just not prepared to put up with the Herzogs, Wenders, and Godards of this world boring me to death with their pet abstractions and obsessions.

And maybe i don’t need or want to watch films that don’t inspire me, don’t charm me, don’t move me; films – like this one is – that make life feel negatively displaced, estranged, futile.

Maybe i’ve just grown-up, got older, matured. I know better now the kind of films i “really” like to see, rather than the films i ought to be admiring.

Dir: Werner Herzog, Germany

5/10

Leave a Comment

Cabaret Balkan (1998)

Took me a while to get into this film. Lots of episodic encounters between seemingly disconnected characters.

Scenes are intense and immediate; dialogues in which the possibility of violent emotion instead of rational resolution seems imminently and threateningly likely.

The film seethes with a kind of close-to-the-edge, end-of-our-tether rage; “Fuck you!” and “What the fuck!” is shouted a lot.

I guess it helps that we know the context for this anarchic, archaic, anger; Serbia under Milosevic, feeling beleaguered; Serbs tainted with being the bad guys, backed up into a corner; civil society going to pot (literally); guns and knifes having to come out as a form of self-preservation and protection.

It’s quite a political film, but the politics are dramatized from within and made to feel personal, psychological, essential.

It doesn’t take alot for the Anger of the disenfranchised to rise up against the Political Elite; take our present disillusion and seething resentment with our own Political Masters re how they’ve been diddling and fiddling us of “our” money. Seemingly reasonable and reasoning Politicians are now vilified as corrupt and morally bankrupt, self-serving parasites. We are not well served.

So imagine “war criminals” Milosevic and Karajic being our political overlords. Anger would be erupting out all over the place; society would be breaking down, broken down, into the kind of personal confrontations and violent vendettas that this film so vividly slaps your face with.

Think I’ll be watching this again.

Dir: Goran Paskaljevic, Serbia

7/10

Leave a Comment

Let the right one in (2008)

Went up to Exeter Picture House to see this. Had high expectations, even tho I usually wouldn’t watch a vampire movie; but there’d been favourable reviews by the critics.

Turns out my expectations were too high.

This film seemed confused as to what kind of film it wanted to be.  Too many jarring tonal shifts between childhood romance, social satire, and that stupefying OTT vampirism.

Think i would have preferred it to stay gently on the achingly melancholic little relationship between the 2 12 year old misfit kids, bullied blonde boy Oskar and undead Eli with her big dark drops of eyes.

Instead you keep getting sudden erruptions of grisly gorishness; not sown seamlessly into the introspective mood of the film, but kind of manically stitched on – then ripped apart, with much gnashing and slashing of teeth.

It seems like normal narrative logic doesn’t apply to this Vampire genre; the more it doesn’t make rational sense the more frightened you’ll be with what you don’t understand; the more inexplicably incoherent internal motivations are the more fascinatingly “other” the wierdness is supposed to be – sparking off scary subconscious fears inside us who sit and gape.

Durr, no. All i start to become aware of is how clunkingly manipulative all the “horror” effects are being. I’m not scared! You’re not scaring me! So stop it – and start developing characters i can actually believe in, have sympathy for.

I mean, i don’t get: why the serial killer father is stringing up his victims in public places. Or, after he’s smashed to his death out of the hospital window, why Swedish social services aren’t knocking on the door of the flat to take his little daughter into care; or why the police aren’t cottoning on to all these grisly goings on in the locality (you don’t see them at all in fact)

I had confirmed to me why i don’t watch films about vampires. They’re preposterous!

All that ravenous neck sucking, and rabid blood guzzling. Not for me i’m afraid. Not that i was afraid. Merely faintly bemused by it all.

Dir: Tomas Alfredson, Sweden

5/10

Leave a Comment

To get to heaven first you have to die (2006)

I’m a sucker for titles like this.

A film of 2 halves. In the first half 20 year old virgin Kamal is wandering around desperate for a shag. He’s been married 3 months but can’t get it up. So he hops onto trains and buses, creeps around supermarkets and factories, desperately on the look out for shaggable females.

It doesn’t help that he seems to have the personality of a snail. Lots of mournful faced passive looking, hardly any talking, no touching.

He’s not getting anywhere. Not even with a prostitute. Seems like it could be a psychological problem he’s got – but we don’t get to know what kind of psychology he’s got; his inscrutable mutism makes him willfully obscure.

In the second half, the film changes tone. Kamal has slept – as in “slept” – with a hoodlum’s estranged wife. The hoodlum appropriates Kamal as an assistant burglar. And things get nasty. Knifes get stuck in. A rape happens (which we don’t see, but hear)

Kamal gets a shot gun, shoots hoodlum in head; goes back to hoodlums wife and shags her on a table; then he’s off back home, now able to give the wife a good seeing to too.

Manhood has been restored. Impotence will be cured when you  shoot your big gun into a nasty mans brains. Seems to be the message.

It’s all very dubious, questionable, unconvincing.

Dir: Djamshed Usmonov,  Tajikistan

5/10

Leave a Comment