Archive for February, 2009

A Taste of Cherry (1997)

A saturnine looking bloke as you can see. With sad eyebrows.

He’s dug himself a hole up on the hill next to a solitary tree. Now he’s driving around looking for someone who will do the dirty deed.

What deed you ask? Its the question the blokes that climb in the car with him are wondering about too. Is he a lonely gay cruising about looking for a bit of pervy action?

No. It’s much pervier than that. He wants them to bury him. In the hole. After he’s killed himself.

You don’t know what he wants for the first 20 minutes or so. Which makes this first 20 minutes or so seem kind of laboured. He picks up a young soldier; lots of questions and stilted talk; the soldier runs away as soon as he – Mr Badii – makes his unusual request.

So now we know; we know he wants to die – and the film notches up a poignant gear or 2; his looking now looks like a last looking at life – a witnessing, a final saying of goodbye.

After the soldier, comes an Islamic seminarist; he’s obviously not going to assist a suicide; the third person he picks up will tho – a taxidermist.

For a third time the car is circling up and around that dusty earthy hill; the scientist tells him a personal anecdote: “I left home to kill myself; i came back with mulberries. A mulberry saved my life“. It’s up to the scientist to give Mr Badii the justification for continuing his life: “You want to give up the taste of cherries?” He does.

Altho his resolve wobbles a fraction. Yet he wants to. We never find out why he wants to. But he has had enough.

He sits on a bench and looks at the sun setting on the horizon. He’s driven by taxi up the dusty hill in the dark to his dug hole by the single windy tree. It’s thundering. He looks at the gliterry lights of the life still being lived below. He smokes a final cigarette.

Gets into his hole. Dogs bark. The moon. The thunder. Lightening. Rain. Eyes close. Blackness. Mr Badii died.

And then Kiarostami tacks on one of these tricksy po-mo endings to get us – as audience – to be self-reflexively conscious that we just watched a film. I was irritated by it. He – the director – is the illusionist; and we -  the consumers – are the disillusioned. So what? I don’t need you to rub it in Kiarostami. I get it. Now stop doing it (he’s done this in other films too)

I’ve seen this film 4 or 5 times now. This time i didn’t feel suicidal enough to be fully soaked inside its gloomy existential mood.

But i suppose i’ll return to it again – one day, and watch it more appropriately.

Dir: Abbas Kiarostami, Iran

7.5/10

Leave a Comment

The Apple (1998)

This is Miss Beautiful’s – Samira Makhmalbaf – first film. She was only 19 when she made it. Beautiful and precociously talented. Some people have all the luck.

When i first saw this a few years ago i was captivated; not charmed by it exactly, but quietly impressed.

Now tho i found it difficult to watch. Painful even. Distressing.

Maybe that’s because we – I – now live in a post-Josef Fritzl world. I don’t feel i can afford to be quite so tolerant towards blatant acts of cruelty towards innocent children. And i know this is a film – but it’s shot more as a veritie documentary: i take it the 2 girls in this film weren’t acting, and neither were their hopeless parents; we’ve got real people here. Real ignorant idiot people. Not idiot savant antics mocked up by Dustin Hoffman for an Oscar.

The father is an old man with a beard and thick glasses; he doesn’t appear to have a clue what’s going on “O God! I’m weary of this life” he wails. He seems more concerned about the dishonour to his character being reported to Social Workers might bring, than the actual damage he’s doing to his 2 girls.

He’s locked them up for 12 years. So boys can’t get at them. They’ve had no contact with the outside world. Never been to school. They don’t speak, and they don’t wash. As a consequence of their “home education” both of them are retards.

One of the girls lolls and licks her tongue out like a lizard feeling the air; they waddle around with spavined gaits like a couple of lame ducks, flapped their wings for arms about.

A sorry scene sums up their plighted existence: banging about on the iron bars of their locked backyard gate with metal spoons, smiling like imbeciles.

It’s all very distressing to watch. I didn’t feel entertained by it; i felt appalled. These idiots for parents! Fear and neglect writ large. Who to feel sorry for? Is any compassion possible here? I couldn’t feel any really. Even tho i could understand that the old man and his blind wife weren’t wilfully or malignantly abusive – merely simpletons; simply scared shitless of life. At the bottom of the heap. Scratching around meagerly to survive their miserly miserable lot in life.

But still.

Social worker intervention Irainian style: return girls back to backward parents; get parents to change their backward ways; get girls set free to waddle about in the street playing and making friends; get the father to saw thro the iron bars he imprisoned them behind.

The film is at pains to make the fathers stupidity sympathetic.

And nobody is to blame. So nobody is to be punished.

The girls will get to eat apples after all.

Dir: Samira Makhmalbaf, Iran

7/10

Leave a Comment

The Joy of Madness (2003)

Behind those shadowy burkas lurk beautiful women.

A 14 year old made this documentary; filming her very beautiful and illustrious older sister Samira Makhmalbalf.

Iranians making films in Afghanistan: “They’ve come here to change our daughters minds” shouts one distrustful burked up Afghani. There’s much distrust of what the film-crew might be up to: “Take my baby for the film but don’t kill it!

Basically, the younger sister – Hana – lurks about with her handheld digi camera, documenting beautiful Samira’s strops with reluctant, even fearful Afghanis she’s trying to cajole into acting in her film “At 5 in the Afternoon”.

Is it a dirty film?” asks the mullah she wants to act as a coach driver; “We chose you because you recite the koran, and you have a long beautiful white beard” soothes Samira. He can’t get over the possible dishonour it might do to his reputation, and starts sliding away his comittment. Samira stomps off exasperated.

Samira gets exasperated alot. But even when she’s exasperated she still looks “cool” – cool as in cooly beautiful. She tries to get a female teacher interested in playing the lead role “I tried with all my heart to give her positive energy – so much fear!“. Eventually, its up to her famous dad Mohsen to come and secure the woman’s signature on the contract.

Can you be less serious, and more like a woman?” Samira asks at one point of her female lead.

Samira is the one who manages to be both:  more like a woman the more serious she becomes. A fiercely and feistily independent woman.

Just like her dad wants her to be.

Dir: Hana Makhmalbaf, Iran

7/10

Leave a Comment

The Way Home (2002)

yshthewayhome2002

Mother dumps kid up the mountain with Granny. Granny is a “deaf dummy”. She’s a bent over cripple with a stick.

The kid is spoilt brat with play station; he’s rude and disrespectful. He’s buzzing and beeping while simple soul Granny sweeps and sows.

Kid is a product of “civilization”: cynical, insensitive, selfish; Granny is a peasant of nature: soft, childlike, innocent.

Kid is gonna have to learn something to unspoil his selfish ways.

Kid carries on buzzing and beeping. Granny carries on silently sowing.

Play station runs out of batteries. Kid gets in a tantrum. Kid gets bored. Kid needs a good slap.

Granny carries on simply sowing.

He wants Kentucky fried chicken; she goes off and returns with a chicken clucking in a bag. “You don’t know anything” he shouts. Gets into another waily tantrum. Kid still needs a good slap.

Only she does know. Something. Which of course he gradually eventually gets.

He learns how to play. How to make friends. How to whistle a cheeky whistle. How to smile his lovely smile. How to be change from spoilt brat to sweet-happy little boy..

How to love his simple little Gran.

Intergenerational gentle comedy with a kind of winsome charm.

Nice but a bit predictable.

Dir: Jeong-hyang Lee, South Korea

6/10

Leave a Comment

Le Beau Mariage

Once again poor Beatrice Romand needs a bloke. She’s had enough of having it off with a married man. “I’m getting married” she tells him “to the man i decide on, who appeals to me. I’ll be very choosy. I’m different. I can do things my way”.

She is different. An odd gawky bird is Beatrice Romand; impulsive, impetuous, big-headed – and yet girlishly charming; and despite all her big talk and grand ideas about herself – vulnerable.

It’s the same old same old Rohmer: self-obsessed “my type, not my type” talk about finding love. About chasing or being chased. Films engrossed – and indulging – in intimacy. And even tho i get irritated by them  – i feel sort of comforted to by all the familiar neurosis that trying to get into intimacy brings – the warm mess of human loving.

You sound like you calculate every move. In fact you’re quite the opposite. You act purely on impulse. You’re insanely selfish” says blonde best friend  Clarisse to Sabine (Romand) “No, wisely selfish” says Sabine.

She does comes across as calculating. And also impulsive. Contradictory and contrary in other words, as well as head-strong – “i tend to argue“.

She’s clapped eyes on Clarisse’s cousin “Edmond” and decided he’s the one. “I intend to make him like me. No man can resist me” (Is this girl conceited or what?!) “With a hard-working husband I’ll be freer to do what i want” (Is this girl selfish or what?!) “I’ll find his weak point, everyone has one. If he doesn’t show me some tenderness next time, i’ll insult him” (Is this girl manipulative or what?!)

So she goes on, with her wilful self-centred machinations: “Instinct tells the female to resist the male so that he’ll desire her (there’s some truth in that) I want him to desire me, to suffer“. You selfish bitch Sabine!

Only he’s not the one that suffers – she is. She’s expecting and waiting for him to call. Waiting. He’s not calling. So she’s calling him. He’s not answering. Avoided and ignored, she’s caught in the rejection trap. Eventually she has to go around to his office to sort it out.

I don’t forsee any tie that will alienate my freedom” he’s saying to her in his sterile lawyerese. “If i get married i want to have chosen my wife freely” So he’s cottoned on to what she was up to. He hasn’t wanted to be made a husband out of. She’s crestfallen. Not so irresistible after all.

She gets into a tantrum:”There are thousands of men more handsome, younger, more interesting than you. Who are worth going after. You’re not!” – and storms out. Hasn’t snared The Husband. I suppose we should feel her selfish machinations have got the kicking they deserve – and yet i felt a tinge of sadness for her too. I think it’s something that Beatrice Romand brings to her character that makes you realise, yes – she’s a capricious little madam – but also there’s a charm about her that is affecting for being so fragile. (I’m starting to sound like a character in a Rohmer film now….Lol)

I always knew i didn’t like him that much” she’s telling Clarisse. How fickle all this love business is! Now i like you, now i don’t like you. I love you – but only if you love me. I desire you, but only if you want me first, and want me more.

That’s the kind of maelstrom of conflicting, ambivalent, emotions that love and relationship mostly is – and which Rohmer, in these 6 Comedies and Proverbs, has tried to show. I’ve seen 4 out of the 6 – and they’ve been irritating and even infuriating to watch at times.

I liked this film much more than i did the first time i saw it. I don’t know why. Maybe i feel more indulgent of Beatrice Romands quirky, gobby, big-headed charm, more sympathetic towards her self-centred vulnerability.

But now I haven’t got any more Rohmer films to watch. That’s it!

I’ll be relieved not to watch any more. And yet i’ve a sneaky feeling i’ll miss not watching them too. Perverse.

His films show – with great sensitivity – how contradictory the nature of loving is, and also how much ambivalence there often is at the heart of everybodys heart.

Dir: Eric Rohmer, France

7.5/10

Leave a Comment

The Return of Martin Guerre (1982)

42-16717323

Yet another weekend freebie (this from The Independent)

French bonnet drama. Yes, everyone is wearing a bonnet – even Gerard Depardieu. With bonnet = bucolic peasantness.

Whatever the French equivalent of BBC costume drama is – this is it. Very solid, very presentably directed, adequately staged, competently crafted.

Bonnets come off for bedroom rapture. Or to signify significant moments.

The taller your hat the more significant you are (i noticed)

After 9 seasons away Martin has returned. But is he an imposter? Who is he really? And what’s he after?

He reads, he writes: “leads to all sorts of mischief” says one suspecting villager (of whom none read, nor write – apart from the priest)

Martin gets found out, goes to trial, has his neck stuck in a noose. Tears flow soggily between Gerard and Nathalie (Bayes) She loved him. He was her true husband.

It’s all decently concieved, suitably confected.

It’s not history tho, it’s entertainment. Just a film.

Doesn’t mean anything meaningful. I failed to be seriously engaged.

Dir: Daniel Vigne, France

5/10

Leave a Comment

Sympathy for the devil (1968)

One of those freebies the weekend broadsheets give away (Times gave this)

Doubting if there was going to be much in this film for me (there wasn’t)

The world’s most bombastic English rock group meets the world’s most pretentious French film director – to produce what? – a socio-political document of the 60’s zeitgeist? The Stones haven’t anything politically pertinent to say now – and they didn’t then either.

They come out of this as perfectly decent chaps; sat on stools, working hard, seeming sensibly sane and sanitised. Not a swear word in sight. Charlie Watts looks bored stiff (mind you he always does) Keith Richard is being a cheeky groovy dude. Jagger is running the show.

They all seem so wimpishly thin. And white.

Godard inserts agit-prop vignettes that now seem tamely stage-managed rather than urgently dramatic. Somebody who looks suspiciously like Mickey Most is hiding behind big red sunglasses reading from the Commie Manifesto (?) in a quaint 60’s sex shop.

None of it is making any sense. Abstract mumbo-jumbo. It’s not meant to be funny, it’s meant to be making serious political points about black revolution, female liberation etc – but it’s ridiculous.

A load of old Godards (as usual)

Might have helped if i’d liked the song too

Dir: Jean-Luc Godard, England/France

3/10

Leave a Comment