Archive for May, 2008

Kontroll (2003)

You can go thro in and out phases watching a film. Well, i can. I did with this.

Feeling immediately engaged (blonde bimbo drunk on escalator goes under train), then sceptical (characters too scuzzy), then warming to it (characters anarchically comic) , then tiring of it (too many randomly “comic” acts of violence), then wanting it to be over.

Then starting to be intrigued again (what’s with the owl?). Then dismayed (will everybody just stop being so bleedin nasty!), then baffled (who is this blackly hooded person pushing people under trains?). Then eventually – and finally – had enough of being stuck down there. Wanting to come up for fresh air, for light.

“Down there” is the Underground (or the Underworld) of the Budapest Metro. And I’ve been in the exhausting company of the ticket “kontrollers” (inspectors); who fall face over tit into chips, gob on the tracks, insult one another, punch passengers or get punched. A bunch of itchy crotched sour faced “arse monkeys” is what they are (that’s them in picture above). “It’s like his shit smells better than mine” says one (2nd from right i think it was)

The fat gob of this film shouts at you in sinister, sarcastic, satirical overtones. It’s boorishly “at you” (Kusterica-style). There’s much manical mayhem and madcap chasing about. Things lurch on the verge of falling apart, veering out of “kontrol” (which makes the films title ironic).

I’ll tell them you grabbed my tits” says a ticketless passenger with prominent busty substances.

In the first hour it was grabbing my balls all over the place. Giving them a queasy squeeze.

And then in the last part there’s the redemptive – but predictable – love story to soften things up, and all that misty symbolism with owls and hoodie guy to deepen things down.

But mostly it’s a “I’m gonna puke on your shoes” kind of film.

Dir: Anal Nimrod, Hungary

6.5/10

Leave a Comment

Human Traffic (1999)

A review at the time it came out concluded that “in years to come, the film will be an interesting but embarrassing period piece”

Well, 9 years later it’s more embarrassing than interesting.

This is what Jip (John Simm) talks like

“Clubbin and E’ing is all i live for man you know what I’m sayin. I’m in a dead-end McJob and me mam’s a prossie. Koop and Moff are me headbangin bruvs, Lulu and Nina me chemical sisters. And this weekend we’re all gettin off out tits man – we’re gonna have 48 hours off from the world”.

If i were an 20 year old pill popping clubbing jungleist, and a bit of a shallow selfish narcissistic hedonist cunt – I’d be lovin this film (man). But I’m not. Wasn’t in 1999 either, and never have been.

So this film isn’t meant for me. (I’m too old and too square)

“We’ll all get bored of it eventually man” says Nina at the end.

She was right.

Dir: Justin Kerrigan, UK

4/10

Leave a Comment

The Inheritance (2004)

Yes, he looks like Charles Kennedy doesn’t he? Not quite so fond of his own voice tho as that loquacious ginger-headed Scots person. Altho he does share Charlie’s tendencies for a drop of booze (later on in the film)

Wasn’t sure whether i wanted to write about this Danish drama – or even if i was gonna bother watching it thro to the end.

I knew after about 10 minutes it would be ok, and would continue to be ok right to the end; there’s a tick box competence about how the film unfolds, it’s all perfectly okly done – like a high level telly soap, a superior version of some BBC 2 drama.

You get pulled in, and pulled along – it’s compelling but comfortably un-challenging; you don’t have to bother to get upset cus you won’t be upset. You can sink into your sofa, eat nuts, drink tea; it’s Sunday, you deserve to be relaxed, and you want something mildly diverting, moderately engaging, intelligently entertaining.

And that is what you get with this. It’ll ok you right up to and into bed – and  your good night’s sleep will go undisturbed.

I’ll think about one thing tho.

“You have to learn to want what you have to do”

Which is what Christoffer (that Charlie in the photo) spends all of the film wrestling with and feeling conflicted by.

He has to grow up into his full adult stature; what he has to do (his duty towards his “inheritance”, the family business, becomes something in the end he is too powerless to resist; he has to fulfill his duty irrespective of what he would prefer, or like to do – for only himself and actress wife)

I suppose many of us (adults) have to convince ourselves that what we’re getting (and having) is what we’re meant to be wanting.

Maybe there are some people who don’t merely want what they have to do out of a sense of dutiful obligation.

They’re actively purposing what they have to do.

Which transforms “wanting” to into “loving” to – and the “having” to becomes their consciously chosen “yes” for life.

(These “some people” aren’t like the Charlie’s of this world obviously. More like the Mahatma’s and Bodhisattva’s)

Quite a deep thought to come out of such an ordinary film.

Dir: Per Fly, Denmark

I wish my name was Per Fly

6/10

Leave a Comment

Since Otar Left (2003)

As her daughter Marina, and grand-daughter Ada look on, 90 year old grandma Eka fixes a ribbon onto the wishing tree.

Apparently she only started acting in films when she was 85. She carries the film on her humpy little back like a trooper. Does the kind of acting that doesn’t seem like acting at all. But like she’s living her life on screen in the way she lives it off it. Being no other self than her self, as authentically given.

And she’s got an indomitable presence which is slightly unnerving for being so still and frankly observant. As if a warthog were peering over at you with very watchful eyes.

(She wore plum coloured nail varnish on her stumpy little fingers that made me wonder, why? The application of vain decorative touches to the hard hoofs of an animal. In a very old womens mind. And what it might be thinking about. Scary.)

Altho some reviews are making out the film depicts Tbilisi as energy stricken and run down – I’d go there like a shot if you offered me a ticket. Especially if i got to live in the ramshackle clatter of colour apartment these 3 women were living in. (Only for a couple of weeks tho)

You get a real sense of family intimacy between them. Grandma gets her feet massaged and read Proust to by Ada. Then – when in hospital recovering from a heart tremor – Marina is at the end of the bed tickling her mothers feet; the affection of that moment comes spontaneously out of nowhere predictable. It doesn’t seem plotted for, simply happened by itself, they did it cus they wanted to, for no reason at all – like in life.

It’ll probably be worth watching this film again in a year or two. See if its quiet subtlety could sift even more poignancy in.

Dir: Julie Bertuccelli, Georgia/France

7.5/10

Comments (1)

Candy (2006)

This isn’t up to much.

The beautiful Heath Ledger and the beautiful Abby Cornish sticking needles in.

Junkies-in-love. Lovely love spiraling down the down escalator into angsty melodrama.

It wants to stay the right side of cool tho. “We’re the coolest people at McDonald’s,” says Cornish, and she’s not being ironic – she means it.

This films tries to “mean it” too much.

Without saying anything we don’t know already.

We know – by now we know – what being a junkie means. What it does. How it all too predictably goes.

It’s nasty. It hurts. Junkies are selfish and self-pitying delusionists.

Heroin addiction is not cool.

This looks like a feel-bad film for aspiring young actors to show they can act anguished. While somehow looking beautifully wrecked doing it.

Good on. Get on with it then.

Only: Heath Ledger died a year after making this of a (prescription) drug overdose.

Which hits you more sadly-awful than any of the lovely-tragic you see him portraying on screen.

Dir: Neil Armfield, Australia

4.5/10

Leave a Comment

Take care of your scarf, Tatjana (1994)

I have to like Kaurismaki films.

Even tho i don’t like to like them.

Don’t like retro rockabilly chic at all.

I can imagine Kaurismaki sitting around drinking pots and bottles of coffee and vodka, listening to 1950’s rockers and Finnish tango, with a fag on, picking at chips and burgers, getting slowly sozzled.

And then quietly belching and burping. Or letting out a gentle quiet fart.

And you have to smile. Cus he’s naff. And doing it on purpose. Without meaning to (cause offence that is)

If there were a Deadpan Olympics, Kaurismaki and Jarmusch would be favourites to lose at everything. Deliberately come last in the Low Jump. Get disqualified doing the 6 Foot Slouch (on the sofa)

Like “Man without a Past” this film seems to be moulded out of the same melancholy. Nobody is getting anywhere much. Nobody is doing anything much. It’s all about putting up with being a Nobody. You can’t help but be the Nobody you are, and were always meant to be. You squeeze out dry farts of droll humour like you were passing wind. Has to be done. But hopefully nobody is noticing.

You’re an Underdog. Nobody is bothering about you. So don’t bother them. Or be bothered by them. Or be bothering.

(See this Jonathan Woss interview from 1991, to get just how laconic – and likeably just like his films- Kaurismaki is)

The Art of Lugubriousness. You either have to like it, or you have to switch off.

I didn’t switch off.

So I’m watching Valto guzzling down potfuls of coffee and Reino cracking open (with his elbow) and quickly emptying yet another bottle of vodka. They’re a couple of boy-men who don’t know how to talk to girls. Or maybe they don’t want to talk to girls. Even tho they’ve got 2 of them in tow, as traveling companions.

Valto takes the creases out of his jacket with a blowtorch. He’s got his car coffee maker bubbling. He’s a big blokey seamstress with a rocker quiff. He locks his cigar smoking, face-slapping mother in the cupboard so he can go get more coffee. Reino is a dodgy mechanic who brylcreems his mustache and looks a bit diddy alongside his lumbering lump of a mate Valto.

You get how absurd this is right?! Affable absurdism. Like watching a gentle black and white silent movie. Only the characters keep forgetting to be silent. Or rather they keep remembering they can speak. So they say something. Occasionally. For old times sake.

It’s only about an hour long – which is long enough. I don’t understand why films have to be an hour and a half long. Let’s have more films that find their natural length rather than go on for longer than they should.

Kaurismaki’s films are for ironic introverts

with lugubrious faces.

And I’m one of them.

Dir: Aki Kaurismaki, Finland

8/10

Leave a Comment

Brokeback Mountain (2006)

Not a bad film. Better than I expected. But not as good as all the Oscar hype would have you believe.

I couldn’t hear about half of the dialogue. Heath Ledger grunts and mumbles thro tightly shut lips. Fair enough, he’s trying to be a tightly shut-lipped kind of guy.

A kind of guy. And a kind of gay. And finding it hard to get the gay out the guy. Doesn’t wish to overtly express but can’t eradicate either – this “natural” kink of his manliness.

The first 40 or so minutes are the best part of the film. Up there on their Brokeback Mountain with only one another for company. Two lonely cowboys together. Or more accurate to say “sheepboys” (they’re riding around tending sheep)

I suppose after a while you can get a bit desperate. I started to understand how sheep-shagging might happen.

But they don’t shag their sheep. They shag one another. Like animals. Heath Ledger like a bucking bronco mounting ontop of something with an arsehole. Jake Gyllenhaal has the arsehole. And it’s available.

It’s not gay porn tho. It’s not at all erotic. They grapple one another, rough and tumble wrestle, tomfool together. There’s a minimum amount of kissing and affectionate touching.

I can’t say i really got their relationship like it was a love affair – until perhaps, right at the end (in retrospect, as a kind of hindsight). Neither of them seemed capable of “love” – either with one another, or with their wifes.

The sadness was in how cut off and estranged from an expressive and vibrant loving soul life these 2 “blokes” were. A couple of yer typical blokes caught up together in a very atypical relationship.

A feeling of regret leftover at the end. They missed out, didn’t follow through. Didn’t get what they wanted.

A film about 2 life’s lived – at heart – essentially unfulfilled. And that’s saddening.

Irrespective of what kind of man (or woman) you are.

Dir: Ang Lee, USA

7/10

Leave a Comment

Whisky (2004)

Glumly droll i think you would call those faces. Not likely to be enjoying life that much.

Neither would you if you worked in a broken down sock factory in downtown Montevideo, Uruguay.

And Mr Kohler (thats him on the right) was your boss. It’s 7.25 a.m and you’re waiting for him outside the garage doors of the factory if you’re Marta (that’s her in the pic) He yanks them up, flips on the whirring machines, flicks on the fluorescent lights, pulls on the broken blinds. Marta brings him his morning tea. They hardly speak. He’s tapping with one finger on his ancient typewriter. She has a solitary fag. The 2 girl sock operatives clock off and have their bags checked (to see if they’re pinching socks. Pinching socks?!) The garage doors are yanked down. Marta is on the bus. Mr Kohler is spluttering off in his old tin can of a car. A day much like any other. A sock making sort of day. Glum almost turning into grim but saved by droll and flat batted about as deadpan.

They have the same day again tomorrow. And the same day the day after. Jacobo (Kohler) is yanking, flipping and flicking, pulling and tapping. Marta is monotonously attending to machines spinning out their socks, smoking her solitary fag. The girl sock operatives want the transistor radio on. Much talking is not going on. Making socks isn’t a lot of fun.

You might be able to tell i like this film by how much detail I’m telling.

Brother Herman from Brazil arrives. There’s an exchange of socks as gifts. Jacobo has asked Marta to pretend to be his wife. They sit around, and wiry livewire Herman is trying to light some spark of life back in to them. Jacobo sits there doing his usual gruff and glum, almost misanthropic. Marta – out of politeness – makes conventional responses, conforming to the good little wife act she’s doing.

Slowly she starts livening up;her spark is being lit. But the warmer she becomes with Herman, the colder Jacobo becomes with both of them.

In the 2nd half of the film Herman has invited them to the seaside. Marta is stirring out of her shy little shell. Herman says more and more. Jacobo says less and less. Nearly every scene seems to have a sad-funny intent, to draw out the pathos of each character.

In the interviews on the Dvd it becomes apparent how much of themselves each of these 3 actors have sacrificed to shrink-wrap themselves into their on screen persona’s. The actress that plays Marta is barely recognizable; her lively personality has been dulled and dumbed down, deliberately flattened flat of effect or energy.

Maybe it’s a bit overdone – this flattening. The reduction done to emphasize how repressed Marta (and Jacobo) are, how small their little sock making life is. They’re not loving their life’s, merely living them – with stoic indifference. But there’s something willed and deliberately contrived about how remorselessly unemotionally unexpressed they’re being. Marta could have been slightly less downtrodden, Jacobo slightly more upbeat – which could have added even more pathos to how sad the smallness is they’ve settled for, resigned themselves to.

But i like the film. It charmed me mostly. It’s brave not to go for upping the tensions into melodramatic cliches, and resolutions that are all too obvious and easy.

The ending is left open-ended. Jacobo is back making his socks. But where’s Marta? You’re left wondering. And you care enough to want to wonder about whether she’ll come back – or whether she’s gone for good.

Dir’s: Juan Pablo Rebella and Pablo Stoll, Uruguay

Juan Pablo Rebella sadly shot himself thro the head in 2006. Read this Obit here

8.5/10

Leave a Comment

The Lives of Others (2006)

Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck. With a name like that you’ve got to be a “Somebody” with your life. Be a 19th century Count. Be a film director.

From the interview with him on the Dvd he’s a top bloke.

East Berlin in 1984, all grimly drab and drably gray. I was there – it was, how it is in this film. You couldn’t get a decent sausage anywhere (actually i did get one – freezing my nuts off at an Imbiss near Friedrichstrasse)

Ulrich Muhe as the Stasi clone is also top; you warm to how warm he becomes, how his heart turns human. How he can’t stop himself from falling in love – with his own humanity.

It’s been nominated for, and won, loads of awards. I’ve already seen it in a 100 Greatest Films list. It thinks of itself as a “great” film (if the interviews on the extras are anything to go by)

It was not great for me. I’m finding it a bit difficult to praise it too much. Something slightly too slick about it, the drabness slightly too polished.

And yet again – and this is becoming a real bugbear of mine – the orchestral soundtrack is conspicuously pulling on your heartstrings, elevating the feelings it thinks you should be having into inflatable sentimentality.

Overall tho, it’s commendable. You’ll feel suitably “entertained”, and suitably seriously enlightened about the weavilly Stasi.

You could comfortably watch with others “The Lives of Others”.

Dir: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, Germany

Ulrich Muhe died last year, only 54.

7.5/10

Leave a Comment

Hero (2002)

Having to have a break from watching this film (an hour in).

The colours are making me feel sick.

Actually it’s cus the story isn’t engaging me.

@

Back again.

It was all sumptuously swoony. Beautiful imagery piled onto lovely effect.

Theres much flying through the air with the greatest of ease, swordy operatics, Zen-speak.

In the CGI enhanced fight sequences you can virtually “see” how actors are being suspended in space by their digitally deleted cables; their flashing blades are speeded up to a blur. Balletic choreography becomes preposterously cartoonish.

This is far from a chop socky film. The fighting is more like dancing. There’s pseudo meaningfulness going on.

It’s lavish. It’s lush.

The 2 boy-girl couples are far too pretty. There’s no real personality to the film; the hero-heroine’s symbolise grandiose archetypes rather than flesh and blood human types (a hero isn’t fearlessly superhuman – but bravely human) All the tragic dying and weeping and wailing is epically staged with music pumping in swathes of Big-Feeling.

The swishy sweet strings of the soundtrack kept putting me on bullshit alert. Repetition of the friggin theme all the way through.

I was saying to myself: “Chill out man, enjoy the visuals – sink back, suck in”

But films like this – hyperbolic, blockbustery – often seem all the same. Conceited and vain. Full of themselves. Too full.

Dir: Yimou Zhang, China

5.5/10

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »